Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Rantin'

I know everyone is eagerly awaiting my latest musings but we haven't done anything but bike ride and hang out on the porch. I was heartened however by a TV commercial I saw last weekend while watching the Duke v Notre Dame lacrosse game. Not many make TV so I was drawn to it. Fast food place called Moe's was the main sponsor and the game was played just up the road in Jacksonville.

So this guy wearing a suit is washing his hands in a public restroom presumably Moe's. He turns away from the sink to show that his pants are soaked. I wasn't listening to this point but this kind of humor is right up my alley. He looks around and finds a hand drier on the wall and takes off his pants, holds them over the outlet causing the pants to fly out horizontal. Just the a friend walks in and the announcer says something like " And then was born the immortal nickname of Wind Sock Jimmy".  The reason this struck me as interesting is that for years Kelly and I have discussed whether it is proper for parents to name a child and then decree that they will call her by something else. I have always maintained that a nickname must be the result of some spontaneous happenstance usually alcohol fueled. Some names are automatic nick names. Anyone with a "Fitz" is a Fitz. Mc and Mac are also Macks. Anyone named Lawlor is a "Red Dog", etc. The commercial proves my point!

4 comments:

  1. Fellow followers:

    Are you becoming as concerned as I am?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm with Linc, this is getting more scary than usual

    ReplyDelete
  3. so, explain Moon....and don't try to persuade us its because of your head......

    ReplyDelete
  4. "whether it is proper for parents to name a child and then decree that they will call her by something else."

    Or call him. Like naming someone Anthony but insisting everyone call him Andy.

    ReplyDelete